Ski-Blog.com

Ski Blog: A guide to the best skiing of the Rockies and my personal journey through the 2005, 2006, and 2007 Seasons.

« Last Chance to Buy American | Main | More on Al Gore and Global Warming - From the WSJ »

March 17, 2007

Buying Away Global Warming

The Aspen Times (registration required) had an article about the increasing cost of "being green" that the wealthy are willing to pay. Through Carbon Offset credits and some slick marketing, the wealthy can feel good about doing their part to save the earth, despite flying around in their Gulfstreams and living in virtual palaces:

The notion of living a green life for the sake of staving off the effects global warming seems to be getting hotter by the minute. Especially among those who can afford the steep price tags for the ever-expanding list of environmentally responsible products and services...

When wealthy tree huggers need to get away from it all, they can buy TerraPasses - the carbon credit certificates distributed to Oscar presenters last month - to counterbalance the damage to the environment caused by jetting off to vacation via private plane. Unfortunately, though, one hour in a Gulfstream GV, for example, burns as much fuel as an entire year of driving, so it would take a $600 TerraPass to offset the carbon dioxide emissions from a single 3,000-mile flight.

However, for just $1,500, a moneyed traveler who flies commercial can buy a TerraPass to offset 1 million airline miles, or 450,000 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions. Plus TerraPass will throw in a free folding bicycle, which can then be conveniently stored in a private bike room.

Certainly, not every environmentalist chooses to travel by air - some drive instead. Which is why it's fortunate that a TerraPass offsetting the carbon emissions of a Lexus hybrid SUV actually costs the same as the one for the regular Lexus SUV. But the best news for penny-pinching nature lovers? At just around $43,000, the Lexus hybrid SUV is barely $6,000 more than the comparable non-hybrid Lexus SUV.

Wind Credits, Carbon Offset Credits, etc., are the biggest load of BS ever created. They allow the wealthy to use their money to "buy" their way into environmental friendliness as opposed to looking like Big City Liberal hypocrits when they fly their Gulfstreams around the world and drive their posse around in 10 Suburbans.

That is what Al Gore, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, etc., are all about. Nancy Pelosi asked for a mega-military plane to fly back and forth to SF. The A-list celebs that handed out Oscars to Al Gore fly around the world in private jets and talk in their little circles about buying carbon credits to offset their lifestyle, allowing them to not actually conserve themselves, but rather to bribe someone else into doing it. And all the while, they feel good about doing their "part".

It is precisely that part of the American lifestyle that is the problem. We all want to be like the celebs. We want H2's like our favorite athlete. We want to fly around the world like the jetsetters. And as we buy larger and larger houses to keep up with the Jones's, we continue to destroy the environment. Yet Hollywood and the wealthy can afford "energy credits" to offset their destroying of the environment.

Hollywood actors and the self appointed leaders of the environmental movement are far different from the rank and file armpit haired, pothead Rastafarian college kids that sport the nasty BO and wear their hemp clothing. Yet we look to these folks that live in mansions to be our conscience about environmental causes. The Inconvenient Truth is that the rich set the example of buying massive vehicles, flying private jets, and owning mega houses that consume massive electricity to power 100" Plasma TV's and heat their pools and hot tubs. We need real leadership and it is leadership by example, not leadership by purchasing "offset credits".

Posted by Justin at March 17, 2007 02:56 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ski-blog.com/cgi-bin/mt32/mt-tb.cgi/398

Comments

Justin,
excellent points you raise. Two weeks ago I was talking about Carbon credits with a few of my students. We came to the same conclusion as you. Is it really right to pay off our lifestyle? No. Is it something we (the wealthy nation) can do to make us feel better about habits. Unfortunately, yes. However, I will still buy wind credits. At least I believe it is for the benefit of building a windfarm infrastructure.

I was also talking at length with some family members who attended the World Econ Conference in Davos. The topic of the Carbon credit, and China's growth were large topics. Again, we concluded that the Carbon credits lacked accountability, and actually do very little.

Very good post Justin,
Jon

p.s. I recommend the movie, Who Killed the Electric car.

Posted by: Jonathan Lawson at March 17, 2007 10:09 PM

Also,
I feel better that today I just replaced all my light bulbs with the new Compact Flourescent' Self-ballasted spiral bulbs. 1/4 the wattage required to light. My "wealthy" friends highly recommended them. Although, they could afford a Gulfstream, they shared your POV on the "Hummer" of the sky.

j

Posted by: Jonathan Lawson at March 17, 2007 10:15 PM

My wife started changing out our bulbs maybe 3 months ago. The new ones suck because they take longer to light up and aren't as bright. But they use next to nothing in electricity.

The answer to all of this is not simply wind or solar power. It is cleaner coal. It is better and safer nuclear power. I am a huge proponent of nuclear power because it makes electricity so abundant and cheap that it absolutely destroys the economic viability of coal. All of the talk about hydrogen fuel cells and electric cars neglects the simple fact that they have to have cheap and reliable electric power to fuel them. And where does that come from? Coal burning power plants. Wind is a pimple on the ass of the amount of electricity generated. It is inefficient and if they wanted to put in a wind farm anywhere near you, no one would like the eyesore.

I get my power from Palo Verde, the last nuclear power plant brought online in the US almost three decades ago and the largest. Now that coal is falling out of style, most new power is from gas turbines that run on Natural Gas. Sure it is cleaner than coal, but it produces CO2. Which every single carbon based fuel source does. Ethanol is a bigger scam than carbon credits.

Funny thing is that most Americans are dumb enough to get suckered into things like Carbon Offsets. I think I need to start a multilevel marketing company to sell energy credits. Talk about a scam and a half. Want some Amway to go with those Green Credits?

Posted by: Justin at March 18, 2007 12:50 AM

JB,
I didn't notice any flicker difference in the spiral bulbs. And only a fraction of a second in the spotlight, they it gets progressively brighter.

I used to live and surf near San Onofre Nuclear PP in Southern CC. We never had a problem, only some "hypergreen" protesting. Nuc PP's would be a very good alternative. As for now, I still like wind. I can deal with the windmills in the eastern plains of CO.

As for the electric cars. I think hybrids are a much better alternative, and if they can make a really good All-wheel Drive subaru that gets substantially better MPH, I'm all over it.

But I like the fact that the electric infrastructure is already in place. I would buy an inexpensive family car to get around town.

Hydrogen fuel cells - humbug, I'm not buying it. Too uncertain, retrofitting gas stations around the country. Transportation and storage seems to be too inefficient.

very good points raised,
jon

Posted by: Jonathan Lawson at March 18, 2007 07:43 AM

I was stationed at Pendleton for almost a year when I was a Navy Corpsman.

My best friend owns a hybrid and it is awesome. But it is 2wd and is a Honda Civic. It is practical for commuting, but that is about it. But that is a huge part of what Americans do in their cars, especially your average 9-5 folks. I work from home. Fact is that we travel in bad weather enough that we need 4WD vehicles for safety and security. It is the folks driving a 4WD H2 with 24" Spinners that make me sick. If you never even engage the 4WD, why get 2-3 MPG less to have something that you don't need?

Posted by: Justin at March 18, 2007 12:00 PM

How do you see Green Tags fitting into this? I ask mainly because the local resorts out here all offer you the chance to purchase some with your pass.

As far as hybrids are concerned, I was mildly surprised this winter to see handfuls of them in the lower parking lots. Granted none of them took the windy, icey, snow covered road to the top of the mountain (possibly due to lack of parking), but they did make it mid-mountain. That's plenty further then I thought they'd make it.

What I've seen more of in the past few years has been the biodiesel. It seems to have a few more issues with the extreme cold temps, but it seems to be a much more valid system. Plus the lovely smell of french fries after a biodiesel vehicle passes can't be beat.

Posted by: Oft-piste at March 19, 2007 10:32 AM

Here is the problem I have with all of these sort of programs (as well as many charities):

It depends on the charity or the program... Basically, many different programs have such high administrative costs that none of the money makes it where you think it is going. That is a major knock against United Way as well as others.

Folks start companies or even non-profits to make money. Sure, it is nice starting a company to "save the world" but the cold hard reality is that we just don't know that programs like this actually are having a real benefit on the environment as opposed to benefiting the folks that created the program. I am always leary, just like I am leary giving a homeless person $5 for "food". Do I really know where the money is going? Or is the simple act of giving enough to make me feel good about myself as opposed to really making a difference in the person's life?

And that brings up the real point of things that I keep making--If you really want to help the homeless, don't give money to bums. Volunteer at a Soup Kitchen, donate clothing, etc. Same with saving the earth. Don't give money to the Sierra Club or Greenpeace. Conserve Energy yourself. Don't buy "Carbon Offset Credits", decrease your own consumption. If the goal is to feel better about being an American Consumer by buying "credits", it is as much a scam as the bums panhandling for "food".

Posted by: Justin at March 19, 2007 12:22 PM

The buying of "offsets" sounds a lot like the selling of "indulgences" by the Church in the Middle Ages. These limousine liberals don't really want to reduce their jetsetting ways, but just want to buy a little sticker that says they are "holier than thou".

The best way to be a good steward of our earthly resources is to tread lightly, which means making better personal choices. Can we carpool to the mountain, can we drive at 70mph instead of 80mph, etc...

Posted by: arvind at March 22, 2007 02:38 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)